AMLCompare
Already providing Tranche 2 services before 1 July 2026? You must enrol with AUSTRAC by 29 July 2026. New providers have 28 days from their first designated service. What the deadline actually means

AML software for real estate agents: what agencies actually need

Updated 19 July 2026 · AML Compare editorial

Short answer: a real estate agency needs software that can verify both sides of a deal, cope with auction-day timing, and produce records an auditor will accept — without paying enterprise prices for reporting features it will rarely use. In our database, verified pricing for platforms that serve real estate runs from $0 (pay-per-use) to $350/month, and the property-native tools handle the sector's real headache — verification that has to keep pace with an exchange — better than the generalists.

Every price here is checked against the vendor's own pages and dated — that's how we work. If you're not yet sure your agency is captured, start with whether real estate agents need to enrol.

Why agencies are captured — and by whom

Since 1 July 2026, brokering the sale, purchase or transfer of real estate is a designated service. That sweeps in selling agents, buyer's agents (from the point of engagement), and developers selling their own stock — and, importantly, when you broker a sale both the buyer and the seller are your customers for AML purposes, so both need due diligence. Even a no-consideration transfer (a family transfer for no price) can be captured.

What's not captured is just as useful to know: property management and leases of 30 years or less generally sit outside the definition of real estate, so a rent roll doesn't drag an agency in on its own. The obligation follows the sales side of the business. Full scope, with the edge cases, is in our real estate enrolment guide.

The auction-day problem (this is the one that matters)

Here's the scenario generic AML software handles badly: the hammer falls on Saturday, contracts exchange on the spot, and the buyer — now your customer — hasn't been verified. A verification portal that blocks the deal until checks clear is useless at an auction. What you need is a workflow built for delayed customer due diligence: exchange now, complete verification on the compliant timeline afterwards.

This is exactly what AMLTranche is designed around — auction and exchange workflows, both-parties handling, and reporting-group support for developer SPVs — at $59/month +GST, the cheapest full platform we track. If your agency runs auctions, that property-native design is worth more than a longer feature list. General information, not legal advice — the timing rules are your responsibility, but the workflow should at least exist.

The market, priced (verified July 2026)

Platforms in our database that serve real estate, cheapest fixed cost first:

  • FreeAML — $0 subscription; $15 per individual check, $35 per entity, with a client-pays option that can move the cost to the customer. No training module.
  • AMLTranche — from $59/mo +GST. Property-first: auction-day delayed CDD, SPV reporting groups, mapped to AUSTRAC's real estate starter kit. The value benchmark for agencies.
  • AML Shield — from $88–89/mo. Starter-kit-aligned with the strongest training story (Nathan Lynch-led).
  • easyAML — from $179/mo +GST plus per-check fees, 12-month term. All-in-one, integrates with Box+Dice and Forms Live.
  • OverSEER AML — from $350/mo. Reporting automation for agencies with genuine transaction-reporting complexity.
  • First AML — quote-based, enterprise; complex-structure specialist for larger or developer clients.
  • NameScan — pay-as-you-go screening only (not a full program); a cheap check layer beside a program tool.

Treat the from-prices as floors — per-check fees change the real bill, which each linked review works through.

Choosing without over-buying

High-volume auction agency: prioritise the delayed-CDD workflow — AMLTranche is built for it, and the price leaves room. Boutique or buyer's agent, lower volume: pay-per-use (FreeAML) or a cheap program subscription plus NameScan screening can be the cheapest compliant route. Larger agency wanting one vendor: an all-in-one like easyAML earns its premium if you value bundled training and support.

Two traps: don't buy enterprise reporting automation you'll never trigger, and don't forget the training obligation — several budget tools don't include it, so budget for it separately and keep completion records. And if you've been searching 'register with AUSTRAC', you almost certainly mean enrolment — a form, not an approval.

Common questions

Do real estate agents need AML software?

Not legally — the obligations (enrol, program, verify both parties, keep records, train staff) can be met with AUSTRAC's free starter kit plus manual process for a very low-volume agency. Software earns its place as deal and verification volume grow, and the property-native tools handle auction timing that manual process struggles with. Our starter kit vs software guide draws the line.

How do we verify a buyer who bids and wins at auction?

You use a delayed-CDD workflow: contracts can exchange on the day, with verification completed on the compliant timeline afterwards. Software built for property (such as AMLTranche) is designed around this; generic tools that block until checks clear aren't. Remember both the buyer and seller are your customers when you broker the sale.

Does an agency need to verify both the buyer and the seller?

When you broker a sale, both parties are treated as your customers for AML purposes, so both need customer due diligence. This is a key difference from tools built for one-sided transactions, and it's why property-native software and workflows matter. See our real estate scope guide for the detail.