easyAML vs First AML
Side by side
| easyAML | First AML | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From A$179 · subscription + per-check | enterprise / quote |
| Sectors | Real estate, Conveyancers, Legal practitioners, Accountants | Legal practitioners, Accountants, Real estate, Trust & company service providers |
| AUSTRAC enrolment | Unverified | Unverified |
| ML/TF risk assessment | Yes | Unverified |
| AML/CTF program & policies | Yes | Unverified |
| Initial customer due diligence | Yes | Yes |
| Ongoing CDD & monitoring | Yes | Partial |
| Suspicious matter reports | Unverified | Unverified |
| Threshold transaction reports | Unverified | Unverified |
| Record keeping | Yes | Partial |
| Staff training | Yes | Unverified |
| Compliance officer & governance | Partial | Unverified |
| Independent evaluation | Unverified | Unverified |
What actually separates them
- Pricing transparency: easyAML publishes an itemised rate card (from $179/mo +GST, per-check fees on top); First AML is quote-only on annual enterprise contracts — no published AU pricing (Jul 2026).
- Product shape: easyAML is software you operate; First AML offers a managed verification service that does the CDD work for you.
- Coverage breadth vs depth: easyAML spans risk assessment, program, CDD, records and training; First AML's confirmed strength is CDD — the rest is Unverified for Australia.
- Complexity ceiling: First AML is built for trusts, layered entities and offshore beneficial ownership; easyAML targets the standard files of small-firm practice.
- Contract terms: easyAML runs a 12-month subscription term per its own FAQ; First AML contracts annually at enterprise scale.
- Track record: First AML operated for years under New Zealand's equivalent regime; easyAML is AU-native, built on Scantek's ISO 27001, Australian-hosted identity infrastructure.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, easyAML or First AML?
Only one side of that comparison is public. easyAML publishes its pricing — from $179/month +GST plus $20 per KYC check on the entry tier (easyaml.com/pricing, Jul 2026). First AML doesn't publish Australian pricing at all; third-party reporting describes a high annual enterprise fee, which we treat as unverified. For most small firms the practical answer is that easyAML is the budgetable option — and if you take a First AML quote, use the published rate card as your anchor.
Which should a small firm choose?
Usually easyAML, and not mainly on price: its subscription covers the program breadth a small firm has to stand up — risk assessment, policies, checks, training — while First AML's annual enterprise contracts are built for bigger operations. The exception is a small firm whose client base is disproportionately trusts and layered structures; that's the file mix where First AML's specialist depth and managed service can earn a premium.
Which handles trusts and complex entities better?
First AML — complex customer due diligence is its centre of gravity: trusts, layered corporate entities, offshore beneficial ownership, backed by years under New Zealand's equivalent regime, with a managed option where its team untangles ownership for you. easyAML's verification runs on Scantek's identity infrastructure and suits standard client files; for genuinely complex structures, the specialist is the safer bet. Both full reviews are linked below.